The United States is squandering its best opportunity to compete in the global battery race.
Noah J. Gordon is acting co-director of the Sustainability, Climate, and Geopolitics Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace in Washington, DC. His research focuses on climate change and how it's changing international politics. He manages projects on climate geopolitics and security, global clean energy supply chains, and the interplay between climate change and migration; and he co-created a Carnegie podcast about animal agriculture and climate change, Barbecue Earth.
Before joining Carnegie, Noah worked as an advisor at the Berlin-based climate think tank adelphi, where he led the Transatlantic Climate Bridge initiative. He was previously the Clara O’Donnell fellow at the London-based think tank The Centre for European Reform and a parliamentary assistant in the Bundestag. Noah was an editor and columnist at Internationale Politik within the German Council on Foreign Relations (DGAP). His writing has appeared in the Washington Post, the Atlantic, Foreign Policy, Foreign Affairs, the New Republic, New Statesman, Euractiv, and Der Tagesspiegel, among others.
The United States is squandering its best opportunity to compete in the global battery race.
The United States battery industry has fallen dangerously behind the global leaders. The main thrust of the U.S. policy response to the battery crisis must be the urgent commercialization of next-generation technologies where the United States can actually enjoy a competitive advantage.
Climate change litigation is experiencing an unprecedented moment. More and more states are turning to international tribunals to seek guidance on a key question: what are their obligations under international law to address the climate crisis?
If you were to unwrap the intersecting problems known as “the polycrisis,” you’d find climate change at the middle. Destructive floods, unaffordable energy, unsustainable debt burdens, and economic conflict between superpowers — the overheating of the planet plays a role in all of them.
Bipartisan Consensus Is Key—but Depends on U.S. Control of Supply Chains.
The tariffs’ full effects on U.S. emissions won’t be clear for years, but what’s certain is that China will respond.
Join the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and the German Council on Foreign Relations for a hybrid discussion on the future of climate foreign policy.
The capitalist pursuit of growth at all costs is one reason the planet is overheating. But it’s also possible, argues Akshat Rathi, to harness the forces of capitalism to tackle the climate crisis. Join the Carnegie Endowment on April 4,for a discussion of Akshat Rathi’s new book Climate Capitalism, named one of the best books of the year by the London Times.
On April 16, scientists, academics, and other experts will convene in Riga, Latvia, for the scoping meeting for the Special Report on Climate Change and Cities, to be included in the Seventh Assessment Report (AR7) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
For the world to meet its climate goals, it needs to undergo a partial shift away from traditional meat toward alternative proteins. But who would be the winners and losers of a global protein transition? In Episode 6, we investigate what this transition might look like and what it could mean for national security and geopolitics.